Hao Sheng Zhou v. Rockaway Hotel Owner LLC
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 32135(U) (Hao Sheng Zhou v. Rockaway Hotel Owner LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hao Sheng Zhou v Rockaway Hotel Owner LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 32135(U) June 15, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156652/2020 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 156652/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/16/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice -------------------X INDEX NO. 156652/2020 HAO SHENG ZHOU, MOTION DATE 09/16/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 - V -
ROCKAWAY HOTEL OWNER LLC,COMALLA CONSTRUCTION LLC,JBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT DECISION + ORDER ON LLC,A&B HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING INC., MOTION
Defendant. -------------------X
ROCKAWAY HOTEL OWNER LLC, COMALLA Third-Party CONSTRUCTION LLC Index No. 596057/2020
Plaintiff,
-against-
JDP DESIGN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant. -------------------.X
ROCKAWAY HOTEL OWNER LLC, COMALLA Second Third-Party CONSTRUCTION LLC, JBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC Index No. 596057/2021
A&B HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, INC.
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,145,150,161,162 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT-SUMMARY Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date of April 15, 2025, Plaintiff
Hao Sheng Zhou's motion for summary judgment on the issue ofliability with respect to his Labor
156652/2020 ZHOU, HAO SHENG vs. ROCKAWAY HOTEL OWNER LLC Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 003
[* 1] 1 of 4 INDEX NO. 156652/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/16/2025
Law § 240(1) claim asserted against Defendants Rockaway Hotel Owner LLC and Comalla
Construction LLC is denied.
I. Background
On December 14, 2019, Third-Party Defendant JDP Design Construction, Inc. ("JDP
Design") employed Plaintiff Hao Sheng Zhou ("Plaintiff') as carpenter at a project constructing
the Rockaway Hotel (the "Premises"). The general contractor at the Premises was
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Second Third-Party Plaintiff Comalla Construction LLC
("Comalla") (NYSCEF Doc. 67 at 29). Plaintiff testified he climbed a six-foot white aluminum
ladder to take measurements on the first-floor ceiling at the Premises when he fell off the ladder,
which shook and wobbled (NYSCEF Doc. 65 at 79-80; NYSCEF Doc. 66 at 25). The ladder was
old, and Plaintiff was concerned about its sturdiness because the metal braces, which lock the
ladder in position, were bent (NYSCEF Doc. 65 at 99-101). When Plaintiff fell, the ladder fell
with him (NYSCEF Doc. 66 at 25).
At the time of Plaintiffs accident, there were many different trades working at the
Premises, including plumbers, sheet rockers, electricians, framers, and HVAC mechanics
(NYSCEF Doc. 67 at 34-35). Comalla contracted JDP Design as a framer and sheet rocker while
A&B Heating was contracted to complete HV AC work (NYSCEF Doc. 67 at 39). According to
JDP's foreman, Plaintiff fell from a blue ladder owned by A&B Heating (NYSCEF Doc. 69 at 80).
A JDP employee present at the time of Plaintiff's fall likewise testified Plaintiff fell from a blue
ladder (NYSCEF Doc. 70 at 53). A&B Heating's witness stated it was not their blue ladder
involved in Plaintiffs accident, but a silver ladder (NYSCEF Doc. 68 at 21 ). Plaintiff admitted he
did not know who the ladder belong to, and admitted he was told not to use other contractors' tools
156652/2020 ZHOU, HAO SHENG vs. ROCKAWAY HOTEL OWNER LLC Page 2 of4 Motion No. 003
[* 2] 2 of 4 INDEX NO. 156652/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/16/2025
(NYSCEF Doc. 66 at 121). Plaintiff now seeks summary judgment on his Labor Law§ 240(1)
claim, which Owner and Comalla oppose.
II. Discussion
"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy, to be granted only where the moving party has
tendered sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact." (Vega v
Restani Const. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]). The moving party's "burden is a heavy one and
on a motion for summary judgment, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-
moving party." (Jacobsen v New York City Health and Hosps. Corp., 22 NY3d 824, 833 [2014]).
Once this showing is made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion to produce
evidentiary proof, in admissible form, sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact
which require a trial (See e.g., Zuckerman v City ofNew York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).
Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movants, the Court finds there are
issues of fact as to whether Plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his accident. As a preliminary
matter, Plaintiff admitted that he was instructed not to use other contractors' equipment on the
jobsite. Nonetheless, he decided to use an aluminum ladder, whose locking mechanism was
noticeably bent, and despite not knowing who owned the ladder (NYSCEF Doc. 66 at 87-88; 100-
01). Moreover, he knowingly placed the ladder on unsteady footing, by allowing three of the
ladder's feet to rest on level concrete but placing the fourth foot on cardboard (NYSCEF Doc. 66
at 94-95). When asked why, he stated "I didn't really give it much thought. I think it's only one of
the feet and it's not that thick of a pile of cardboard." (Id). Furthermore, Plaintiff admitted that he
knew his employer had its own ladders on the job site and they were "very stable and steady" and
he admitted that those ladders were available to him but he decided to use the allegedly defective
adder because it was "right by me" (NYSCEF Doc. 66 at 102).
156652/2020 ZHOU, HAO SHENG vs. ROCKAWAY HOTEL OWNER LLC Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 003
[* 3] 3 of 4 INDEX NO. 156652/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/16/2025
On this record, Plaintiff has failed to eliminate triable issues of fact as to whether he was
the sole proximate cause of his accident. Indeed, Plaintiff admitted there were other adequate safety
devices available, yet he seemingly chose to use an old and defective ladder, whose owner was
unidentified, and despite being instructed by his employer to only use JDP design ladders.
Therefore, Plaintiffs motion is denied (see Cantre v BLDF Oceanside LLC, 216 AD3d 451 [1st
Dept 2023]; Quinones v Olmstead Properties, Inc., 133 AD3d 87 [1st Dept 2015]; Garzon v
Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 10 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2010]).
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability
with respect to his Labor Law§ 240(1) claim against Defendants Rockaway Hotel Owner LLC
and Carnalla Construction LLC is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Defendants shall serve a copy of this
Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
. MARY V. ROSADO, J.S.C.
CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED x NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED [ ; ] DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 32135(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hao-sheng-zhou-v-rockaway-hotel-owner-llc-nysupctnewyork-2025.