Hantman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hantman v. State

1925 OK CR 292, 236 P. 443, 31 Okla. Crim. 17, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 6, 1925

DocketNo. A-4750.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 292 (Hantman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hantman v. State, 1925 OK CR 292, 236 P. 443, 31 Okla. Crim. 17, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the municipal criminal court of Tulsa on a charge of vagrancy, under section 1956, Comp. St. 1921. An appeal was filed in this court on June 28, 1923. No briefs have been filed by appellant as required by the rules of this court. If the matter is not of sufficient importance to appellant to present the contentions of error relied upon this court will not search the record for errors on which to reverse, but, where no fundamental error appears on the face of the record, will affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the municipal criminal court of Tulsa on a charge of vagrancy, under section 1956, Comp. St. 1921. An appeal was filed in this court on June 28, 1923. No briefs have been filed by appellant as required by the rules of this court. If the matter is not of sufficient importance to appellant to present the contentions of error relied upon this court will not search the record for errors on which to reverse, but, where no fundamental error appears on the face of the record, will affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 292, 236 P. 443, 31 Okla. Crim. 17, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hantman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.