Hanthan v. Devon Gardens, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanthan v. Devon Gardens, Inc.

9 A.D.2d 915, 195 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5494

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 915 (Hanthan v. Devon Gardens, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanthan v. Devon Gardens, Inc., 9 A.D.2d 915, 195 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a subcontractor to foreclose a bonded mechanic’s lien, the Special Term found, after trial, that plaintiffs had substantially performed their contract and had done certain extra work, and that the balance due plaintiffs therefor was $14,426.50. The court also found that defendants Devon Gardens, Inc., and Bronxville-Devon Corp. were entitled to a credit, under the contract, of $1,998 and an allowance of $883.82 for correcting work improperly performed by plaintiffs. The court awarded plaintiffs $11,544.68, with interest, less an offset of $6,899 which was found to be the damages of defendant Bronxville-Devon Corp. under its counterclaim based upon plaintiff’s failure to perform certain extra work pursuant to an option for their services. Judgment modified upon the law and the facts by striking from the decretal paragraph “Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Forty-four and 68/100 ($11,544.68') Dollars ” and “ Six Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-nine and No/100 Dollars ” and by substituting therefor “ $11,239.74” and “ $2,977 ” respectively, and by adjusting the interest and the final amount of the judgment accordingly. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the finding by the trial court that plaintiffs substantially performed their contract is supported by the record. The proof warrants a finding, however, that the cost of remedying plaintiffs’ defective work was $1,188.76. We also find no evidence in the record that defendant Bronxville-Devon Corp. exercised its option with respect to one of the other buildings, or that there was such a repudiation of the contract by plaintiffs as would have made it futile to exercise the option. (Cf. Schaefer v. Thompson, 237 N. Y. 55; Didier v. Macfadden Pubs., 299 N. Y. 49, 53.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a subcontractor to foreclose a bonded mechanic’s lien, the Special Term found, after trial, that plaintiffs had substantially performed their contract and had done certain extra work, and that the balance due plaintiffs therefor was $14,426.50. The court also found that defendants Devon Gardens, Inc., and Bronxville-Devon Corp. were entitled to a credit, under the contract, of $1,998 and an allowance of $883.82 for correcting work improperly performed by plaintiffs. The court awarded plaintiffs $11,544.68, with interest, less an offset of $6,899 which was found to be the damages of defendant Bronxville-Devon Corp. under its counterclaim based upon plaintiff’s failure to perform certain extra work pursuant to an option for their services. Judgment modified upon the law and the facts by striking from the decretal paragraph “Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Forty-four and 68/100 ($11,544.68') Dollars ” and “ Six Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-nine and No/100 Dollars ” and by substituting therefor “ $11,239.74” and “ $2,977 ” respectively, and by adjusting the interest and the final amount of the judgment accordingly. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the finding by the trial court that plaintiffs substantially performed their contract is supported by the record. The proof warrants a finding, however, that the cost of remedying plaintiffs’ defective work was $1,188.76. We also find no evidence in the record that defendant Bronxville-Devon Corp. exercised its option with respect to one of the other buildings, or that there was such a repudiation of the contract by plaintiffs as would have made it futile to exercise the option. (Cf. Schaefer v. Thompson, 237 N. Y. 55; Didier v. Macfadden Pubs., 299 N. Y. 49, 53.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 915, 195 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanthan-v-devon-gardens-inc-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack