Hanten Bond Co. v. Patterson

156 N.W. 70, 36 S.D. 587, 1916 S.D. LEXIS 156
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 1, 1916
DocketFile No. 3849
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 N.W. 70 (Hanten Bond Co. v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanten Bond Co. v. Patterson, 156 N.W. 70, 36 S.D. 587, 1916 S.D. LEXIS 156 (S.D. 1916).

Opinion

POLEEY, P. J.

In this case notice of appeal was served on the respondent .on the 29th day of 'June, 1915, and certified copy thereof filed in this court on the 8th day of July, 1915. On the 10th day of December, 1915, the record was settled and filed by the trial court. Appellant having failed to' serve or file his brief within the time allowed by law, respondent procured an [588]*588order citing' appellant to show cause why the judgment appealed from should not be affirmed because of appellant’s failure to prosecute said appeal. To said order appellant made no response, nor have any steps been taken to: prosecute said appeal.

This being the case, the appeal will be deemed ft> have been abandoned, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loveland v. Perriton
207 N.W. 100 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.W. 70, 36 S.D. 587, 1916 S.D. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanten-bond-co-v-patterson-sd-1916.