Hanson v. Voll

California Supreme Court

Hanson v. Voll

21 P. 971, 3 Cal. Unrep. 117

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 2, 1889

DocketNo. 11,951

StatusPublished

This text of 21 P. 971 (Hanson v. Voll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanson v. Voll, 21 P. 971, 3 Cal. Unrep. 117 (Cal. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

BELCHER, C. C.

This case was submitted, without oral argument, on briefs to be filed. The time allowed for filing briefs has elapsed, and none have been filed. In such case the rule is well settled that judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record. We therefore advise that the judgment here appealed from be affirmed.

We concur: Hayne, C.; Foote, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELCHER, C. C.

This case was submitted, without oral argument, on briefs to be filed. The time allowed for filing briefs has elapsed, and none have been filed. In such case the rule is well settled that judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record. We therefore advise that the judgment here appealed from be affirmed.

We concur: Hayne, C.; Foote, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 P. 971, 3 Cal. Unrep. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-voll-cal-1889.