Hanson v. Transportation General, Inc.

701 A.2d 329, 243 Conn. 914, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 403
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 18, 1997
DocketSC 15766
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 A.2d 329 (Hanson v. Transportation General, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanson v. Transportation General, Inc., 701 A.2d 329, 243 Conn. 914, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 403 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 441 (AC 16527), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Should the relative nature of the work test be adopted as an alternative to the right to control test in concluding whether the plaintiffs decedent, a cab driver, was an independent contractor and not an employee of the defendant taxi cab company?

[915]*915The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15766. Lawrence C. Sgrignari, in support of the petition. Jason M. Dodge, in opposition. Decided September 18, 1997

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the finding of dismissal pursuant to the right to control test in light of the department of transportation regulations?

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the compensation review board’s refusal to correct the finding of dismissal as requested by the plaintiff?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanson v. Transportation General, Inc.
716 A.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 A.2d 329, 243 Conn. 914, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-transportation-general-inc-conn-1997.