Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hanson v. State

Hanson v. State

114 S.E.2d 887, 101 Ga. App. 636, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 969
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1960·No. 38234·Published

Opinions

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was convicted on an indictment charging the making of distilled spirits, alcohol, whisky, mixed liquors and beverages in a dry county. His motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied, and he assigns error on this judgment.

[637]*637Decided April 14, 1960 Rehearing denied May 12,1960. Walton Hardin, for plaintiff in error. J. Cecil Davis, Solicitor-General, contra.

In Wilson v. State, 215 Ga. 775 (113 S. E. 2d 607), the Supreme Court said: “There is no provision of law for the court in the trial of a criminal case to entertain a motion for a judgment of not guilty notwithstanding a verdict of guilty.”

It follows that the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty must stand, inasmuch as the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict could not properly be before the court in the trial of a criminal case and is not before this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend, Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. State, 114 S.E.2d 887, 101 Ga. App. 636, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 969 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

114 S.E.2d 887 (Hanson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
113 S.E.2d 607 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
White v. State
89 S.E. 175 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Coulter v. State
111 S.E. 214 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)