Hanson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hanson v. State

363 So. 2d 623, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16853

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1978

DocketNo. 77-812

StatusPublished

This text of 363 So. 2d 623 (Hanson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanson v. State, 363 So. 2d 623, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16853 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed each of the points raised on appeal and, in our opinion, appellant has failed to show any reversible error. See, e. g., Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla.1975); and Carroll v. State, 186 So.2d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966). Accordingly, having reviewed the record, listening to arguments of counsel, and applying the applicable principles of law, we believe that the judgment and sentence appealed should be affirmed. See, e. g., Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); State v. Allen, 335 So.2d 823 (Fla.1976); Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44 (Fla.1974); Lane v. State, 353 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Borders v. State, 312 So.2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Hampton v. State, 304 So.2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Thompson v. State, 300 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Miller v. State, 300 So.2d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Harris v. State, 229 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Whitley v. State, 265 So.2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); State v. Ell-Gee, Inc., 255 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Paul v. State, 209 So.2d 464 [624]*624(Fla. 3d DCA 1968); and Vaughn v. State, 198 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed each of the points raised on appeal and, in our opinion, appellant has failed to show any reversible error. See, e. g., Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla.1975); and Carroll v. State, 186 So.2d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966). Accordingly, having reviewed the record, listening to arguments of counsel, and applying the applicable principles of law, we believe that the judgment and sentence appealed should be affirmed. See, e. g., Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); State v. Allen, 335 So.2d 823 (Fla.1976); Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44 (Fla.1974); Lane v. State, 353 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Borders v. State, 312 So.2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Hampton v. State, 304 So.2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Thompson v. State, 300 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Miller v. State, 300 So.2d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Harris v. State, 229 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Whitley v. State, 265 So.2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); State v. Ell-Gee, Inc., 255 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Paul v. State, 209 So.2d 464 [624]*624(Fla. 3d DCA 1968); and Vaughn v. State, 198 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 So. 2d 623, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack