Hanson v. Smith

1 Cal. Unrep. 261
California Supreme Court·Decided February 5, 1866·No. No. 781·Published

Opinion

SHAFTER, J.

The plaintiff was not entitled to a judgment payable in gold coin. The contract was in every material particular like that sought to be enforced in Reese v. Stearnes, 29 Cal. 273, decided at the October term, 1865.

Judgment was taken against the defendants by default, entered by the direction of the plaintiff’s attorney. The [262] counsel fees, the amount paid for taxes, together with the interest thereon, were improperly included in the judgment as being in excess of the relief prayed for in the complaint: Lattimer v. Ryan, 20 Cal. 628; Grautier v. English, Oct. Term, 1865.

The court below is directed to modify the judgment so as to conform it to the views expressed in this opinion. Further ordered that appellant recover his costs of appeal.

We concur: Sawyer, J.; Sanderson, J.; Rhodes, J.; Currey, C. J. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. Smith, 1 Cal. Unrep. 261 (Cal. 1866).

1 Cal. Unrep. 261 (Hanson v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lattimer v. Ryan
20 Cal. 628 (California Supreme Court, 1862)
Reese v. Stearns
29 Cal. 273 (California Supreme Court, 1865)