Hanson v. Silver Lake Railway & Lumber Co.

268 P. 881, 148 Wash. 308, 1928 Wash. LEXIS 866
Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 6, 1928·No. No. 21266. Department One.·Published

Opinion

French, J.

The plaintiff seeks to foreclose a lien against a railway owned by the defendants Silver Lake Railway & Lumber Company and Charles R. McCormick Lumber Company, alleging that the Wright Construction Company, general contractor, was engaged in grading the right of way, and that he had furnished hay and grain to a sub-contractor, which hay and grain were used for feeding horses used in grading the right of way. Demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and the plaintiff electing to stand on his complaint, judgment of dismissal was entered and this appeal follows.

The sole question for determination is whether a person furnishing hay and grain for use for feeding and maintaining horses of a sub-contractor working *309 on a railroad right of way has a lien against the railway for the value of the feed furnished, where the railway has failed to take and file a bond.

The question involved was first before this court and decided adversely to appellants in Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co., 36 Wash. 529, 78 Pac. 1106. Thereafter the lien statute was amended [Rem. Comp. Stat., § 1129], and was again before this court and decided adversely' to appellant’s contention in Tsutakawa v. Kumamoto, 53 Wash. 231, 101 Pac. 869, 102 Pac. 766.

This court still adheres to the principle announced in the two cases above cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Fullerton, O. J., Parker, Mitchell, and Tolman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. Silver Lake Railway & Lumber Co., 268 P. 881, 148 Wash. 308, 1928 Wash. LEXIS 866 (Wash. 1928).

268 P. 881 (Hanson v. Silver Lake Railway & Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.
78 P. 1106 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)
Tsutakawa v. Kumamoto
101 P. 869 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)