Hanson v. Robbins
This text of 215 P. 1103 (Hanson v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
prepared the opinion for the court.
With the exception of the question as to whether or not a transfer of the stock involved in this action was procured by respondent’s testator by false and fraudulent representations, this case is controlled by the decision in Wood v. Robbins et al., ante, p. 409.
As to the question of false and fraudulent representation, while the testimony is slightly different from the controlling case we are of the same opinion as was therein expressed, namely, that the evidence does not preponderate against the [415]*415finding that there was no fraud or false representation used by respondent’s testator.
Upon the authority of Wood v. Robbins, supra, we recommend that the judgment be affirmed.
Per Curiam: For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.'
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 P. 1103, 67 Mont. 414, 1923 Mont. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-robbins-mont-1923.