Hanson v. McGraw-Hill Co.

213 A.D. 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, and the verdict of the jury unanimously reinstated, with costs to the appellant. The learned trial justice set aside the verdict in favor of the plaintiff solely on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We are of the opinion that the trial justice was correct in the first instance in leaving the question of contributory negligence to the jury as a question of fact. We are in accord with the reasoning [874]*874in Teich v. Seidman’s Garage (188 N. Y. Supp. 488). The cases cited by the learned trial justice all relate to accidents where the plaintiff was struck ly a descending elevator after he had wholly or partly entered an elevator shaft. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. McGraw-Hill Co., 213 A.D. 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

213 A.D. 873 (Hanson v. McGraw-Hill Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sgandurra v. 220 Estates, Inc.
185 Misc. 283 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Zucker v. Ephraim Realty Corp.
243 A.D. 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)