Hanson v. Hanson

142 P. 348, 70 Or. 469, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 276
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 142 P. 348 (Hanson v. Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanson v. Hanson, 142 P. 348, 70 Or. 469, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 276 (Or. 1914).

Opinion

[470]*470Department 2.

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit for divorce. The answer also contains a counterclaim for a divorce. The Circuit Court tried the case, and found that both plaintiff and defendant were in the habit of becoming intoxicated, and that most or all of the altercations related occurred when both were intoxicated; that plaintiff’s reputation for chastity at the time of her marriage with defendant was bad, which fact was well known to defendant;'that plaintiff and defendant are drunken and immoral, and that a court of equity will not undertake to grant relief where both parties are guilty of a violation of the marital obligations—and rendered a decree dismissing the complaint, without cost to either party.

After a review of the evidence, we are satisfied that the decree is a proper one, which we affirm, neither party to recover costs in this court. Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Bean and Mr. Justice McNary concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Crawford
133 S.E.2d 232 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
State v. Rollo
351 P.2d 422 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1960)
State v. Sing
229 P. 921 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Wong Wen Teung
195 P. 349 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
State v. Peare
233 P. 256 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 P. 348, 70 Or. 469, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-hanson-or-1914.