Hanson v. Hanson

272 P. 543, 83 Mont. 428, 1928 Mont. LEXIS 38
Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 17, 1928·No. No. 6,337.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION:

PER CURIAM.

For failure to comply with the terms of a decree of divorce plaintiff was cited for contempt. Upon the hearing the court found him not guilty and entered an order dismissing the contempt proceeding. From this order the defendant, who brought the proceeding, has attempted to appeal, but in the face of section 9921, Revised Codes 1921, which provides in part that “the judgment and orders of the court or judge, made in cases of contempt, are final and conclusive, and there is no appeal,” nothing remains for us to do but to dismiss the attempted appeal, and it is so ordered. (See State ex rel. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Loud, 24 Mont. 428, 62 Pac. 497.)

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. Hanson, 272 P. 543, 83 Mont. 428, 1928 Mont. LEXIS 38 (Mo. 1928).

272 P. 543 (Hanson v. Hanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marriage of Hammermeister
2004 MT 38N (Montana Supreme Court, 2004)
Lee v. Lee
2000 MT 67 (Montana Supreme Court, 2000)
O'Neill v. O'Neill
603 P.2d 257 (Montana Supreme Court, 1979)