Hanson v. Farese

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanson v. Farese

31 Misc. 779, 65 N.Y.S. 1135

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 779 (Hanson v. Farese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanson v. Farese, 31 Misc. 779, 65 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

The action is to recover the value of services rendered by the plaintiffs to the defendant as veterinary surgeons. The employment of the plaintiffs was disputed at the time, but there was sufficient evidence adduced in their behalf to- warrant the justice in finding, as he did, in their favor.

The defendant is in error with respect to the contention that the co-partnership of the plaintiffs was not established. Proof of such fact will be found on the first and second pages of the stenographer’s minutes.

The exceptions noted by the defendant are without merit.

We conclude , that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmae, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI