Hanson v. Byers

164 S.E.2d 915, 118 Ga. App. 654, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 964
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hanson v. Byers. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Ga. App. 298
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1968·No. 44043·Published

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

The present case is before this court on appeal from the ruling of the Judge of the Superior Court of Fulton County confirming a sale under power under the procedure provided for in the Act approved March 28,1935 (Ga. L. 1935, p. 381; Code Ann. § 37-608 through § 37-611). The only enumerations of error relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to authorize the ruling of the trial judge that the property brought its true market value. There was an alleged error argued in the brief but not enumerated in the enumeration of errors. Held:

1. The evidence was amply sufficient to authorize the finding of the trial judge.

2. The alleged error argued in the brief but not contained in the enumeration of errors filed with this court cannot be considered.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. Byers, 164 S.E.2d 915, 118 Ga. App. 654, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 964 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

164 S.E.2d 915 (Hanson v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.