Hanson v. Associates Finance Inc.

496 P.2d 266, 27 Utah 2d 349, 1972 Utah LEXIS 986
Utah Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 1972·No. No. 12556·Published

Opinion

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a no-cause-of-action judgment after trial based on an alleged conversion in 1964 of a home radio antenna and lead-in wire, and for damages for a trespass incident to the conversion. Affirmed, with costs to defendants.

In spite of plaintiff’s urgence, the judgment was based on believable, although disputed evidence, to the effect that he knew who owned the property and stood mute during its repossession, — inconsistent with his claim of ownership or the concept of trespass de bonis asportatis and quaere [350]*350clausum fregit, — and that there was, therefore,, no basis for an estoppel of defendants’ claim of ownership, as asserted by plaintiff.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT, and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. Associates Finance Inc., 496 P.2d 266, 27 Utah 2d 349, 1972 Utah LEXIS 986 (Utah 1972).

496 P.2d 266 (Hanson v. Associates Finance Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.