Hanson-Murphy, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan

698 So. 2d 1378, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10600, 1997 WL 577790
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1997
DocketNo. 97-1508
StatusPublished

This text of 698 So. 2d 1378 (Hanson-Murphy, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanson-Murphy, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan, 698 So. 2d 1378, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10600, 1997 WL 577790 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because it is obvious that at least some damages were sustained in that county, we agree with the trial court that this claim for malicious prosecution of a civil action accrued for venue purposes in Orange County where that action was filed, see §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995)1; 92 C.J.S. Venue § 19 n. 35 (1955); 77 Am.Jur.2d Venue § 39 (1997); see Soowal v. Marden, 452 So.2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); E.J. Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Southeast First Nat’l Bank, 415 So.2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see generally Kumar v. Embassy Kosher Tours, Inc., 696 So.2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1986), even though other injuries may have been subsequently [1379]*1379incurred in Dade County where the present plaintiffs, then-defendants, reside. See Gaboury v. Flagler Hosp., Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Since none of the present defendants, then-plaintiffs, reside in Dade County, there is no basis for fixing venue here. The order under review transferring the instant case to Orange County is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soowal v. Marden
452 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Kumar v. Embassy Kosher Tours, Inc.
696 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Tucker v. Fianson
484 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc.
316 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
E. J. Sales & Service, Inc. v. Southeast First National Bank of Miami
415 So. 2d 906 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 So. 2d 1378, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10600, 1997 WL 577790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-murphy-inc-v-first-federal-savings-loan-fladistctapp-1997.