Hansford v. State
This text of 64 S.E.2d 459 (Hansford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the trial of one charged with larceny, where it is shown by the, evidence that recently, after the commission of the offense, the stolen goods were found in the possession of the defendant, that fact, while it would not require them to do so, would authorize the jury to infer that the accused was guilty unless he. explained his possession to their satisfaction. Warren v. State, 76 Ga. App. 243 (45 S. E. 2d, 726); Lewis v. State, 120 Ga. 508 (48 S. E. 227); Gravitt v. State, 114 Ga. 841 (40 S. E. 1003); Morris v. State, 47 Ga. App. 792 171 S. E. 555); Vining v. State, 80 Ga. App. 756 (57 S. E. 2d, 354); Long v. State, 62 Ga. App. 775 (9 S. E. 2d, 845).
The judgment of the trial court overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on the general grounds only, is without error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 S.E.2d 459, 83 Ga. App. 502, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansford-v-state-gactapp-1951.