Hansen v. Woodland Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hansen v. Woodland Construction Co.

701 So. 2d 672, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13319, 1997 WL 731288

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1997·No. No. 97-1154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record, we find that there was competent, substantial evidence to support the appeals referee’s denial of benefits. Perez v. State, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 377 So.2d 806, 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)(“[T]his court lacks authority to interfere with an administrative decision based upon an acceptable view of the evidence below.”). Therefore, we affirm the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record, we find that there was competent, substantial evidence to support the appeals referee’s denial of benefits. Perez v. State, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 377 So.2d 806, 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)(“[T]his court lacks authority to interfere with an administrative decision based upon an acceptable view of the evidence below.”). Therefore, we affirm the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s decision.

Affirmed.

Hansen v. Woodland Construction Co., 701 So. 2d 672, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13319, 1997 WL 731288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

701 So. 2d 672 (Hansen v. Woodland Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related