Hansen v. Stoll
This text of 237 A.D. 892 (Hansen v. Stoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. When an automobile comes in contact with a tree off the traveled portion of the road under the circumstances shown here, including the physical condition of the car, with marks from a sliding of the wheels due to the application of brakes indicative of excessive speed, lack of control or negligence, sufficient is established to [893]*893require the defense to overcome the prima facie showing of negligence thus arising. The nonsuit was error. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-stoll-nyappdiv-1933.