Hansen v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.
278 U.S. 561, 49 S. Ct. 27
Opinion
The writ of error is dismissed for want of a substantial, federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hansen v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co., 278 U.S. 561, 49 S. Ct. 27 (1928).
278 U.S. 561 (Hansen v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shulthis v. McDougal
225 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Hall v. Burr
234 U.S. 712 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Norton v. Whiteside
239 U.S. 144 (Supreme Court, 1915)