Hansen v. State Liquor Authority
421 N.E.2d 504, 53 N.Y.2d 693, 439 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2342
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. On the record here, we cannot say that the determination of the State Liquor Authority, that public convenience and advantage would not be promoted by granting the appellant’s application, was arbitrary or capricious, much less irrational (see Matter of Mandee Liqs. v Roth, 57 AD2d 961, affd 44 NY2d 653).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hansen v. State Liquor Authority, 421 N.E.2d 504, 53 N.Y.2d 693, 439 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2342 (N.Y. 1981).
421 N.E.2d 504 (Hansen v. State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of White Plains Fine Wine & Spirits LLC v. New York State Liq. Auth.
2020 NY Slip Op 3585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)