Hansen v. State Liquor Authority
This text of 421 N.E.2d 504 (Hansen v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. On the record here, we cannot say that the determination of the State Liquor Authority, that public convenience and advantage would not be promoted by granting the appellant’s application, was arbitrary or capricious, much less irrational (see Matter of Mandee Liqs. v Roth, 57 AD2d 961, affd 44 NY2d 653).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 N.E.2d 504, 53 N.Y.2d 693, 439 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-state-liquor-authority-ny-1981.