Hansen v. State

421 So. 2d 504
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 1982
Docket61315
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 421 So. 2d 504 (Hansen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hansen v. State, 421 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 1982).

Opinion

421 So.2d 504 (1982)

Erling Knud Ove HANSEN, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 61315.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 28, 1982.

Baya Harrison, III, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and David P. Gauldin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

BOYD, Justice.

This cause is before us to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, State v. Hansen, 404 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). The decision directly and expressly conflicts with State v. Carroll, 378 So.2d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1980). We have jurisdiction to resolve this conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Petitioner was charged with sexual battery upon a person eleven years of age or younger in violation of section 794.011(2), Florida Statutes (1979). The trial court granted petitioner's motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that since the victim was eleven years and three months of age at the time of the crime, she was not a person eleven years of age or younger as provided for in the statute. The trial court relied on State v. Carroll, which held that the statute is ambiguous and therefore should be construed in favor of the accused. On appeal, the district court reversed and remanded for trial, holding that the statute is clear.

We find the reasoning expressed in the opinion of the district court to be correct and we adopt it as our own. The decision of the first district in Hansen is accordingly *505 approved. The decision of the fourth district in Carroll is disapproved.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and ADKINS and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

McDONALD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Branson v. State
145 S.W.3d 57 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Mendoza
795 N.E.2d 316 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2003)
State v. Marshall
4 P.3d 1039 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)
Arkow v. State
707 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Shabazz
622 A.2d 914 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
State v. Jordan
528 A.2d 731 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1987)
State v. Carlson
394 N.W.2d 669 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
C.W.P. v. State
424 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
State v. Helfond
428 So. 2d 279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 So. 2d 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-state-fla-1982.