Hansen v. Muller
This text of 286 N.W. 880 (Hansen v. Muller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before the court a second time. See Hansen v. Muller,
The action is one to recover damages for the loss of the comfort, society, aid and assistance of plaintiff's wife due to alleged malicious acts of the defendant in debauching and carnally knowing plaintiff's wife. The defendant denied the allegations of the complaint. We have reviewed the record and are convinced that the verdict finds ample support in the evidence. The assignments of error relate principally to the rulings of the trial court upon questions of evidence and to alleged misconduct of counsel. If any error is disclosed by the record, we are convinced that it was without prejudice to the plaintiff.
The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
POLLEY, ROBERTS, RUDOLPH, and SMITH, JJ., concur.
WARREN, P.J., disqualified and not sitting. *Page 530
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 N.W. 880, 66 S.D. 529, 1939 S.D. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-muller-sd-1939.