Hansen v. Muldoon

210 Ill. App. 513
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 9, 1918
DocketGen. No. 6,522
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 Ill. App. 513 (Hansen v. Muldoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hansen v. Muldoon, 210 Ill. App. 513 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Mechanics’ liens, § 113*—when subcontractor entitled to Tien after abandonment of contract. Where the original contractor abandons his contract and fails to carry it out, it is necessary to prove that the owner was indebted to the original contractor, under the contract, before a lien can be enforced against the owner for the benefit of a subcontractor. 4. Mechanics’ liens, § 196*—when not shown that owner indebted to contractor at time of service of notice of lien by subcontractor. On a bill by a subcontractor against the contractor and the owner to establish a mechanic’s lien ■ for work, labor and material furnished before abandonment of the contract by the contractor, evidence held insufficient to show that at the time of service of notice of a lien there was money due the contractor from the owner. On Petition fob Reheabing. Equity, § 479*—denial of relief not based upon pleadings. A subcontractor seeking to establish a mechanic’s lien, in a suit against the owner and contractor, cannot have relief upon grounds not stated in his pleadings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eastwood v. Road District No. 5
230 Ill. App. 281 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 Ill. App. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-muldoon-illappct-1918.