Hansen v. Janitschek
This text of 158 A.2d 329 (Hansen v. Janitschek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in that court, and the matter is remanded to the trial judge who heard the ease for reconsideration and a new determination.
For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet-TINO—7.
For affirmance—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.2d 329, 31 N.J. 545, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-janitschek-nj-1960.