Hansen v. Independent School District No. 1

114 P.2d 736, 62 Idaho 614, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 38
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1941
DocketNo. 6867.
StatusPublished

This text of 114 P.2d 736 (Hansen v. Independent School District No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hansen v. Independent School District No. 1, 114 P.2d 736, 62 Idaho 614, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 38 (Idaho 1941).

Opinion

MORGAN, J.

The facts of this case will be found in the opinion heretofore rendered and reported in 61 Ida. 109, 98 Pac. (2d) 959. Pursuant to direction contained *615 in the opinion on rehearing, further testimony was taken in the district court and a decree was entered which is, in part, as follows:

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that. Independent School District No. 1 of Nez Perce County, Idaho, be and it is hereby enjoined and restrained from allowing commercial baseball games to be played on Bengal Field after the hour of 10:45 P.M., Pacific Standard Time, and further restrained and enjoined from allowing noise incident to said games to exist, and the lights used in connection with said games to shine into and on plaintiffs’ premises so as to interfere with their sleep and reasonable and necessary enjoyment of their property, all after the hour of 10:45 P.M., Pacific Standard Time, and further enjoining and restraining said district during the time Bengal Field is used for commercial baseball games from allowing baseballs to be knocked or thrown from Bengal Field onto plaintiffs’ premises and from allowing people in search of said baseballs during such time to trespass thereon, and further restraining and enjoining said district during the time commercial baseball games are being played on Bengal Field from allowing automobiles to be parked on the streets adjacent to plaintiffs’ property in such a way as to interfere with the free ingress and egress to plaintiffs’ properties.”

The case is here on plaintiffs’ appeal from the decree, which conforms to the direction contained in our decision on rehearing of the former appeal. The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

Givens, Holden and Ailshie, JJ., concur. Budge, C. J., expresses no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hansen v. Independent School District No. 1
98 P.2d 959 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 P.2d 736, 62 Idaho 614, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-independent-school-district-no-1-idaho-1941.