Hansen v. Hansen

237 A.D.2d 253, 654 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2173
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 253 (Hansen v. Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hansen v. Hansen, 237 A.D.2d 253, 654 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated June 22, 1992, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated February 16, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion to correct the amount apportioned by the New York City Police Pension Fund, Article II, as the defendant’s share of the plaintiff’s pension and to set the defendant’s total interest in the plaintiff’s pension at $17,825.50, and (2) an order of the same court, dated April 9, 1996, which granted the same relief.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 16, 1996, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 9, 1996; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 9, 1996, is affirmed; and it is further,

[254]*254Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court was correct in holding that the defendant is entitled to only one half of the deferred compensation portion of the plaintiffs disability pension and no portion of the disability pension which constitutes compensation for personal injuries (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [2]; Mylett v Mylett, 163 AD2d 463). Furthermore, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation agreement and judgment of divorce, the defendant’s total share of the plaintiff’s pension from his employment with the New York City Police Department is $17,825.50. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pulaski v. Pulaski
22 A.D.3d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
McNelis v. McNelis
6 A.D.3d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Link v. Link
304 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D.2d 253, 654 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-hansen-nyappdiv-1997.