Hansen v. Hansen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hansen v. Hansen

86 A.D.2d 859, 447 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15488

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 86 A.D.2d 859 (Hansen v. Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hansen v. Hansen, 86 A.D.2d 859, 447 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered July 22, 1981, as awarded a counsel fee of $3,500 to the plaintiff wife’s attorney. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, the decretal paragraph awarding counsel fees is deleted, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for a hearing consistent herewith. Special Term awarded a counsel fee of $3,500 to plaintiff’s attorney (exclusive of a $1,000 retainer which plaintiff charged on defendant’s credit card as to which the latter has undertaken to pay) solely on conflicting affidavits and written statements of financial worth. Á hearing should be held so as to do justice between the contending parties. (Wood v Wood, 73 AD2d 963; Yagoda v Yagoda, 73 AD2d 619.) It will be necessary to determine (1) an appropriate counsel fee for the plaintiff’s attorney and (2) the relative financial circumstances of the parties, so as to permit a proper allocation of the fee. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered July 22, 1981, as awarded a counsel fee of $3,500 to the plaintiff wife’s attorney. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, the decretal paragraph awarding counsel fees is deleted, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for a hearing consistent herewith. Special Term awarded a counsel fee of $3,500 to plaintiff’s attorney (exclusive of a $1,000 retainer which plaintiff charged on defendant’s credit card as to which the latter has undertaken to pay) solely on conflicting affidavits and written statements of financial worth. Á hearing should be held so as to do justice between the contending parties. (Wood v Wood, 73 AD2d 963; Yagoda v Yagoda, 73 AD2d 619.) It will be necessary to determine (1) an appropriate counsel fee for the plaintiff’s attorney and (2) the relative financial circumstances of the parties, so as to permit a proper allocation of the fee. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 A.D.2d 859, 447 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-hansen-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack