Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co.

146 N.W. 976, 125 Minn. 524, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 24, 1914

DocketNos. 18,620 — (83)

StatusPublished

This text of 146 N.W. 976 (Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co., 146 N.W. 976, 125 Minn. 524, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811 (Mich. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a personal injury action in which, after a verdict for plaintiff, defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion for judgment was denied, but a new trial granted on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Defendant appealed from the order.

Following Kommerstad v. Great Northern Ry. Co. supra, page 297, 146 N. W. 975, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a personal injury action in which, after a verdict for plaintiff, defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion for judgment was denied, but a new trial granted on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Defendant appealed from the order.

Following Kommerstad v. Great Northern Ry. Co. supra, page 297, 146 N. W. 975, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 N.W. 976, 125 Minn. 524, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-great-northern-railway-co-minn-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack