Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co.
146 N.W. 976, 125 Minn. 524, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811
Opinion
This is a personal injury action in which, after a verdict for plaintiff, defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion for judgment was denied, but a new trial granted on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Defendant appealed from the order.
Following Kommerstad v. Great Northern Ry. Co. supra, page 297, 146 N. W. 975, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co., 146 N.W. 976, 125 Minn. 524, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811 (Mich. 1914).
146 N.W. 976 (Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co.
146 N.W. 975 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)