Hansen v. Emery

Second Circuit

Hansen v. Emery

194 F. 1021, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1252

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 15, 1912·No. Nos. 158, 159·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These causes come here upon appeal from decrees of the District Court, Eastern District of New York, entered in cross-actions brought to recover damages arising out of a collision between the steamship Diaria and the bark Boylston. The District Court held the Diana solely in fault for the collision. The opinion of Judge Chatfield will he found in 181 Fed. 263. A majority of this court are of the opinion that the decrees should he-affirmed — that in the first cause with interest, and with a-single bill of costs', in both causes — upon the opinion of the District Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These causes come here upon appeal from decrees of the District Court, Eastern District of New York, entered in cross-actions brought to recover damages arising out of a collision between the steamship Diaria and the bark Boylston. The District Court held the Diana solely in fault for the collision. The opinion of Judge Chatfield will he found in 181 Fed. 263. A majority of this court are of the opinion that the decrees should he-affirmed — that in the first cause with interest, and with a-single bill of costs', in both causes — upon the opinion of the District Judge.

Hansen v. Emery, 194 F. 1021, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1252 (2d Cir. 1912).

Pincite

194 F. 1021 (Hansen v. Emery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related