Hansen v. Dodd

California Court of Appeal

Hansen v. Dodd

131 Cal. App. 786

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 10, 1933

DocketCiv. No. 4855

StatusPublished

This text of 131 Cal. App. 786 (Hansen v. Dodd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hansen v. Dodd, 131 Cal. App. 786 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This proceeding has for its purpose the question as to the true boundary lines of the City of Crescent City, and therefore, for the reasons set forth in action No. 4854, entitled “City of Crescent City, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. G. Fletcher Dodd, as City Clerk and Ex-officio Assessor of City of Crescent City, Respondent” (ante, p. 153 [18 Pac. (2d) 999]), is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This proceeding has for its purpose the question as to the true boundary lines of the City of Crescent City, and therefore, for the reasons set forth in action No. 4854, entitled “City of Crescent City, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. G. Fletcher Dodd, as City Clerk and Ex-officio Assessor of City of Crescent City, Respondent” (ante, p. 153 [18 Pac. (2d) 999]), is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 Cal. App. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansen-v-dodd-calctapp-1933.