Hanselmann v. McCardle

242 S.E.2d 421, 270 S.C. 367, 1978 S.C. LEXIS 517
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 14, 1978
Docket20639
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 242 S.E.2d 421 (Hanselmann v. McCardle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanselmann v. McCardle, 242 S.E.2d 421, 270 S.C. 367, 1978 S.C. LEXIS 517 (S.C. 1978).

Opinion

Ness, Justice:

These are actions for wrongful death and pain and suffering brought against three physicians, their professional associations, a laboratory technician and a laboratory aid. This appeal is from an order denying a demurrer interposed by Carmelisa Edwards, a laboratory technician, and Flonnie Brooks, a laboratory aid. We affirm.

Sommai Hanselmann suffered from hemotysis which eventually caused respiratory and cardiac arrest. She died on July 29, 1975. Appellants Edwards and Brooks, employees of Richland Memorial Hospital, performed laboratory tests in connection with Ms. Hanselmann’s illness.

Respondent alleged, inter alia, that Edwards and Brooks did not follow specified laboratory procedures and failed to exercise proper care in reporting the laboratory results. Appellants’ demurrer asserted that as a matter of law, public employees enjoy immunity from suit for all discretionary official acts not done maliciously, and as the complaint failed to allege any malicious conduct by appellants, it failed to state a cause of action.

We believe the demurrer was properly denied. The scope of immunity, if any, enjoyed by appellants is a critical issue which should be decided at trial rather than by demurrer. Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co., 249 S. C. 130, 153 S. E. (2d) 184 (1967); Crowley v. Bob Jones University, 268 S. C. 492, 234 S. E. (2d) 879 (1977). 1

Accordingly, the order denying appellants’ demurrer is affirmed.

Lewis, C. J., and Littlejohn, Rhodes and Gregory, JJ., concur.
1

See also Sams v. Sams, 247 S. C. 467, 148 S. E. (2d) 164 (1966); Dismukes v. Carletta et al., S. C., 236 S. E. (2d) 421, filed July 14, 1977; 71 C. J. S. Pleading § 265, p. 548.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCall ex rel. Andrews v. Batson
329 S.E.2d 741 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
McCall v. Batson
329 S.E.2d 741 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Shea v. State
310 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1983)
State Ex Rel. McLeod v. Fritz Waidner Sports Cars, Inc.
263 S.E.2d 384 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1980)
Stalheim v. Doskocil
257 S.E.2d 738 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1979)
Williams v. Streb
243 S.E.2d 926 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 S.E.2d 421, 270 S.C. 367, 1978 S.C. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanselmann-v-mccardle-sc-1978.