Hanscom v. Meyer

48 L.R.A. 409, 82 N.W. 114, 60 Neb. 68, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 100
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 21, 1900
DocketNo. 11,073
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 48 L.R.A. 409 (Hanscom v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanscom v. Meyer, 48 L.R.A. 409, 82 N.W. 114, 60 Neb. 68, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 100 (Neb. 1900).

Opinion

Holcomb, J.

In proceedings of foreclosure of a real estate mortgage in the district court of Douglas county, on an application for confirmation of a sale of real estate made in said action, the defendants, appellants, objected thereto, and moved to set aside the sale, on the ground that notice of sale by publication in the Omaha Mercury was insufficient, alleging that that publication was not a newspaper as provided by section 497 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The objection was overruled, and by appeal the case is brought to tins court. The section referred to provides as follows: “Lands and tenements, taken in execution, shall not be sold until the officer cause public notice of the time and place of sale to be given, for at least thirty days before the day of sale, by advertisement in some newspaper printed in the county, or, in case no newspaper be printed in the county, in some newspaper in general circulation therein. * * * All sales-made without such [70]*70advertisement shall be set aside, on motion, by the court to which the execution is returnable.”

The point in issue is whether the Omaha Mercury is a newspaper within the meaning of the section quoted. In the affidavit in support of the motion to set aside, it is said: “That said Omaha Mercury published weekly at Omaha, Nebraska, is a class paper devoted specially to the interests of the lawyers of Douglas county, Nebraska. That said Omaha Mercury is a paper which is confined to the-particular trade, calling or business interest of the lawyers of Omaha, has a limited circulation and is not a newspaper as by law provided and required.” A copy of one’issue of the paper is made an exhibit, which is said to be “a fair sample of said publication.” The proprietor of the publication challenged makes affidavit that “he is the owner and proprietor of the Omaha Mercury, a newspaper printed and circulated every Friday in the city of Omaha, Douglas county, Nebraska, and elsewhere. That this affiant says that it is not true that said Omaha Mercury is a class paper, or that it is confined to the interests of the lawyers of Omaha, or Douglas county. That said Omaha Mercury, then known as the Omaha Watchman, was established in the year 1870, and has been published weekly ever since said date. That said paper contains each week news of a general character, such as is to be found in the average weekly paper published in Nebraska; that of late years it has made a specialty of the news of the courts, and of legal matters in general, but that it is not true that it is devoted to the legal profession in any sense which would render it a ‘class publication.’ That said paper has a large and valuable subscription list, and that its said subscribers are of all classes and professions; that said newspaper has a wide circula-' tion in Douglas county and the state of Nebraska, but that it is also taken and paid for by various classes of people in a great number of the states of the Union. That for the past twenty years it has been the custom of lawyers and others, to publish legal notices in said paper— [71]*71so much so that the people of Douglas county and the state of Nebraska, and throughout the entire United States, look first in its columns for legal advertisements in which they are interested; that it has published in the past, and still continues to publish, the greater percentage of legal notices in Douglas county, including orders required to be published by the district and circuit court of the United States, and of the district and county courts of Douglas county, and that said paper is commonly designated by the judges of the aforesaid courts as the paper in which to publish the various orders required to be published by said courts.”

Webster’s Dictionary defines a newspaper to be “A sheet of paper printed and distributed, at short intervals, for conveying intelligence of passing events; a public print that circulates news, advertisements, proceedings of legislative bodies, public documents and the like. Burrill’s Law Dictionary gives this definition: “A paper or publication conveying news or intelligence. A printed publication, issued in numbers at stated intervals, conveying intelligence of passing exents. The term ‘newspaper’ is popularly applied only to such publications as are issued in a single sheet, and at short intervals, as daily or weekly.” It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine with clearness and exactness where the line of demarcation should be drawn between a newspaper in a legal and common acceptation of the term and the numerous publications devoted to some special purpose, which circulate only among a certain class of the people, and which are not within the purview of statutes requiring publication of legal notices in some newspaper. The daily and weekly newspapers common to all parts of the country, of general circulation among the people, without regard to class, vocation or calling, devoted to the gathering and dissemination of news of current events of interest to all, and usually espousing and advocating principles of some political party with persistency, if not at all times with consistency, are, [72]*72without doubt, newspapers within the meaning of the statute. On the contrary, many publications, such as literary, scientific, religious, medical and legal journals, are obviously for but one class of the people — and that class always but a small part of the entire public — are not newspapers within the legal and ordinary meaning of the word, and it would be manifestly unjust, as well as against the letter and spirit of the law, to recognize such publications as proper for the advertisement of legal notices; the object in all cases being to give wide and general publicity regarding the subject of which notice is required to be published. The paper in question partakes, in a degree, of the characteristics of each of the two classes mentioned. If, however, it has the distinguishing features required to make it a newspaper as ordinarily defined, the fact that it also makes a specialty of some particular class of business, and conveys intelligence of particular interest to those engaged in such business, will not thereby deprive it of its general classification as a newspaper within the meaning of the statute.

In Lynch v.Durfee, 59 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 409, it is held: “A weekly paper,.containing matters of general interest, and having a general circulation among professional and business men, is a newspaper within the meaning of How. St., sec. 5801, providing for the publication in a newspaper of certain notices in probate proceedings, though it is primarily devoted to disseminating matters of interest to the legal profession.” In the opinion it is said: “But a newspaper, even in the days when these statutes were enacted, meant, what it means to-day, a sheet of paper printed and distributed at short intervals for conveying intelligence of passing events; a public print that circulates news, advertisements, proceedings of legislative bodies, public documents, and the like.”

In Linn v. Allen, 44 N. E. Rep. [Ind.], 646, it is held that a periodical, ephemeral in form, issued daily except Sundays, devoted to the general dissemination of legal news, and containing other matters of general interest to the public, is such a paper.

[73]*73In the case of Railton v. Lander, 18 N. E. Rep. [Ill.], 555, the evidence in the case showed that the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 1990
Great Southern Media, Inc. v. McDowell County
284 S.E.2d 457 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1981)
City of Corpus Christi v. Jones
144 S.W.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
King County v. Superior Court for King County
92 P.2d 694 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
In re Estate of Castanien
29 Ohio Law. Abs. 152 (Ohio Probate Court of Franklin County, 1939)
Bising v. City of Cincinnati
184 N.E. 837 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)
Continental Life Insurance v. Mahoney
49 S.W.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1932)
Burak v. Ditson
229 N.W. 227 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)
Sims v. Etheridge
150 S.E. 647 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
McDowell v. David
276 P. 419 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Legal Ledger, Inc. v. Hodgson
222 N.W. 646 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)
Culclasure v. Consolidated Bond & Mortgage Co.
114 So. 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
State Ex Rel. Yaegar v. Rose
114 So. 373 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Baldwin v. Brown
224 P. 462 (California Supreme Court, 1924)
In Re Application of Green
131 P. 91 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Tylee v. Hyde
60 Fla. 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Times Printing Co. v. Star Publishing Co.
99 P. 1040 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Merrill v. Conroy
109 N.W. 175 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Hall v. City of Milwaukee
91 N.W. 998 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 L.R.A. 409, 82 N.W. 114, 60 Neb. 68, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanscom-v-meyer-neb-1900.