Hansbrough v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Hansbrough v. State

791 So. 2d 1084, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 515, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1382, 2001 WL 776206

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 2001

DocketNo. SC00-1322

StatusPublished

This text of 791 So. 2d 1084 (Hansbrough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hansbrough v. State, 791 So. 2d 1084, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 515, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1382, 2001 WL 776206 (Fla. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Hansbrough v. State, 757 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the following questions as being of great public importance:

WHETHER SECTION 817.234(8), FLORIDA STATUTES, INCLUDES A REQUIREMENT OF SPECIFIC INTENT TO DEFRAUD THE INSURER.

and, if not

WHETHER THE STATUTE ADVANCES THE GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST IN PREVENTING INSURANCE FRAUD AND IS NOT MORE EXTENSIVE THAN IS NECESSARY TO SERVE THAT INTEREST.

Id. at 1283. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

These questions were both answered in the negative in our recent opinion in State v. Bradford, 787 So.2d 811, 822 (Fla.2001). Consistent with Bradford, the district court’s decision is quashed and the case is remanded with directions that Hans-brough’s conviction be reversed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI