Hansbrough v. State

791 So. 2d 1084, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 515, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1382, 2001 WL 776206
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 12, 2001·No. No. SC00-1322·Published

Opinion

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Hansbrough v. State, 757 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the following questions as being of great public importance:

WHETHER SECTION 817.234(8), FLORIDA STATUTES, INCLUDES A REQUIREMENT OF SPECIFIC INTENT TO DEFRAUD THE INSURER.
and, if not
WHETHER THE STATUTE ADVANCES THE GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST IN PREVENTING INSURANCE FRAUD AND IS NOT MORE EXTENSIVE THAN IS NECESSARY TO SERVE THAT INTEREST.

Id. at 1283. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

These questions were both answered in the negative in our recent opinion in State v. Bradford, 787 So.2d 811, 822 (Fla.2001). Consistent with Bradford, the district court’s decision is quashed and the case is remanded with directions that Hans-brough’s conviction be reversed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hansbrough v. State, 791 So. 2d 1084, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 515, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1382, 2001 WL 776206 (Fla. 2001).

791 So. 2d 1084 (Hansbrough v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hansbrough v. State
757 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
State v. Bradford
787 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)