Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hansard v. State

Hansard v. State

114 S.E. 551, 29 Ga. App. 206, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 162
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1922
Docket13848
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 551 (Hansard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hansard v. State, 114 S.E. 551, 29 Ga. App. 206, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 162 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without substantial merit; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke omd Bloodworih, JJ., concur. E. 8. Griffith, H. 0. Strickland, James Beall, Emmett Smith, for plaintiff in error. Willis Smith, solicitor, Smith & Millican, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 551, 29 Ga. App. 206, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansard-v-state-gactapp-1922.