Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hansard v. Georgia Power Company

Hansard v. Georgia Power Company

124 S.E.2d 926, 105 Ga. App. 486, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 963
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1962
Docket39276
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 124 S.E.2d 926 (Hansard v. Georgia Power Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hansard v. Georgia Power Company, 124 S.E.2d 926, 105 Ga. App. 486, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 963 (Ga. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Feankum, Judge.

E. F. Hansard, an employee of Georgia Power Company, while working for his employer, died as a result of a heart attack. His widow filed a claim for 'compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Compensation was denied. Held:

The mere fact that an employee suffered a fatal heart attack while working for his employer does not, in and of itself, require a finding that the attack was caused by exertion on the part of the employee in the course of his employment. Hoffman v. National Sur. Corp., 91 Ga. App. 414 (85 SE2d 784); Griffeth v. County of Barrow, 92 Ga. App. 698 (89 SE2d 895); Callaway Mills Co. v. Hurley, 100 Ga. App. 781 (112 SE2d 320), s. c. 104 Ga. App. 811 (123 SE2d 7).

“No rule is more firmly established under the workmen’s compensation law than that stated in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hopkins, 71 Ga. App. 175, 177 (30 SE2d 357): ‘The workmen’s compensation act makes the finding of the board upon the facts final and conclusive, and in the absence of fraud such finding cannot be set aside by any court, if there is any competent evidence to support it. [Citations.] The weight and credit to be given to the testimony of the witnesses and also the conflicts in the evidence were matters for determination by the board. [Citations.]’ ” Wilkins v. Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 101 Ga. App. 467 (1) (114 SE2d 216).

There is sufficient evidence to support the finding of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation that the employee’s duties did not precipitate the heart attack.

The superior court did not err in affirming the award of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G & H Logging, Inc. v. Burch
341 S.E.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Southwire Co. v. Cato
302 S.E.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Employees Mutual Liability Insurance v. Bennett
251 S.E.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Guye v. Home Indemnity Co.
244 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Brown Transport Corp. v. Blanchard
190 S.E.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Videtto
184 S.E.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Phoenix Ins. of Hartford v. Weaver
183 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Moorman
179 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Cabin Crafts, Inc. v. Pelfrey
168 S.E.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Burson v. Howell
145 S.E.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Wilson v. Aragon Mills
138 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.E.2d 926, 105 Ga. App. 486, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hansard-v-georgia-power-company-gactapp-1962.