Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry
This text of 739 F.2d 484 (Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Following our opinion in Bothke v. Fluor Engineers, et al. and W.J. Terry, 713 F.2d 1405, certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3566, 82 L.Ed.2d 867. On July 2, 1984, that Court vacated the judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984).
The cause is now remanded to the district court for the purpose of determining whether Terry is qualifiedly immune in accordance with the standards set forth in Davis v. Scherer.
Unless plaintiff-appellant Bothke can meet the burden of showing a violation of constitutional rights that were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue, the district court will enter a judgment of dismissal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 F.2d 484, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hans-bothke-v-fluor-engineers-and-constructors-inc-and-wj-terry-ca9-1984.