Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry

739 F.2d 484, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19850
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 3, 1984·No. 81-5457·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Following our opinion in Bothke v. Fluor Engineers, et al. and W.J. Terry, 713 F.2d 1405, certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3566, 82 L.Ed.2d 867. On July 2, 1984, that Court vacated the judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984).

The cause is now remanded to the district court for the purpose of determining whether Terry is qualifiedly immune in accordance with the standards set forth in Davis v. Scherer.

Unless plaintiff-appellant Bothke can meet the burden of showing a violation of constitutional rights that were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue, the district court will enter a judgment of dismissal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry, 739 F.2d 484, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19850 (9th Cir. 1984).

739 F.2d 484 (Hans Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and W.J. Terry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. Gates
812 F. Supp. 1050 (C.D. California, 1993)
Maraziti v. First Interstate Bank
953 F.2d 520 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Maraziti v. First Interstate Bank Of California
953 F.2d 520 (First Circuit, 1992)
Elder v. Holloway
975 F.2d 1388 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Toyota of Visalia
772 F. Supp. 481 (E.D. California, 1991)