Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R.

51 N.Y.S. 1142

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1898·Published

Opinion

No opinion. Motion to amend order denied. The amendment sought would be of no avail to the plaintiff—First, because the judgment of this court being unanimous, and the case one for personal injury, an appeal to the court of appeals cannot be taken except by the authority of this court or by allowance of a judge of the court of appeals; second, as there was a motion made in the action for a new trial and an order denying that motion was reversed, the question of fact could not be taken to the court of appeals. See Wright v. Hunter, 46 N. Y. 409, and 45 N. Y. Supp. 474.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Motion to amend order denied. The amendment sought would be of no avail to the plaintiff—First, because the judgment of this court being unanimous, and the case one for personal injury, an appeal to the court of appeals cannot be taken except by the authority of this court or by allowance of a judge of the court of appeals; second, as there was a motion made in the action for a new trial and an order denying that motion was reversed, the question of fact could not be taken to the court of appeals. See Wright v. Hunter, 46 N. Y. 409, and 45 N. Y. Supp. 474.

Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R., 51 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

51 N.Y.S. 1142 (Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related