Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R.
This text of 51 N.Y.S. 1142 (Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No opinion. Motion to amend order denied. The amendment sought would be of no avail to the plaintiff—First, because the judgment of this court being unanimous, and the case one for personal injury, an appeal to the court of appeals cannot be taken except by the authority of this court or by allowance of a judge of the court of appeals; second, as there was a motion made in the action for a new trial and an order denying that motion was reversed, the question of fact could not be taken to the court of appeals. See Wright v. Hunter, 46 N. Y. 409, and 45 N. Y. Supp. 474.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 N.Y.S. 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanrahan-v-brooklyn-el-r-nyappdiv-1898.