Hanower v. Union Bank
This text of 126 A.D. 905 (Hanower v. Union Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the papers it appears that the defendant should have been permitted to take the deposition of the plaintiff before trial. The order for her examination ought not, therefore, to have been vacated. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate order for plaintiff’s examination before trial denied. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D. 905, 110 N.Y.S. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanower-v-union-bank-nyappdiv-1908.