Hanover v. Roberts

206 So. 2d 401, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6044
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1968·No. No. 1634·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Williams v. Clyatt, 1907, 53 Fla. 987, 43 So. 441, 444; Prout v. J. W. McWilliams Co., 1928, 96 Fla. 423, 118 So. 209; Andrews v. Andrews, 1945, 155 Fla. 654, 21 So.2d 205; Spencer v. Spencer, 1948, 160 Fla. 749, 36 So.2d 424; Taylor v. Taylor, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 323; Albury v. Gordon, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 549; and Johnson v. Johnson, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 112.

CROSS, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanover v. Roberts, 206 So. 2d 401, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

206 So. 2d 401 (Hanover v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Johnson
179 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Albury v. Gordon
164 So. 2d 549 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Andrews v. Andrews
21 So. 2d 205 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Spencer v. Spencer
36 So. 2d 424 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Prout v. J. W. McWilliams Co.
118 So. 209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Williams v. Clyatt
53 Fla. 987 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Taylor v. Taylor
97 So. 2d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)