Hanover National Bank v. Oriental Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanover National Bank v. Oriental Bank

162 A.D. 894, 146 N.Y.S. 780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D. 894 (Hanover National Bank v. Oriental Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanover National Bank v. Oriental Bank, 162 A.D. 894, 146 N.Y.S. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per- Curiam:

If the defendant desires to raise the question as to whether or not the claim is Darred by the Statute of Limitations, it cannot be done by a motion to strike out, but must be taken by answer. The order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per- Curiam:

If the defendant desires to raise the question as to whether or not the claim is Darred by the Statute of Limitations, it cannot be done by a motion to strike out, but must be taken by answer. The order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D. 894, 146 N.Y.S. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanover-national-bank-v-oriental-bank-nyappdiv-1914.