Hanover Nat. Bank v. Suddath
153 F. 1021, 82 C.C.A. 676, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488
Opinion
This action was before us upon a previous writ of error. Van Zandt v. Hanover Nat. Bank (C. C. A.) 149 Fed. 127. The present record, mutatis mutandis, is identical with that on the former review. The only differences relate to immaterial changes occasioned by the lapse of time. The facts are the same, and no reason has been advanced Tyhich induces us to change our view of the law. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hanover Nat. Bank v. Suddath, 153 F. 1021, 82 C.C.A. 676, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488 (2d Cir. 1907).
153 F. 1021 (Hanover Nat. Bank v. Suddath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Zandt v. Hanover Nat. Bank
149 F. 127 (Second Circuit, 1906)