Hanover Lithographing, Inc. v. Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanover Lithographing, Inc. v. Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc.

49 A.D.2d 862, 374 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 862 (Hanover Lithographing, Inc. v. Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanover Lithographing, Inc. v. Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc., 49 A.D.2d 862, 374 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 17, 1975, in favor of plaintiff against defendant, Weiss & Biheller Merchandise Corporation, in the sum of $24,496.92, dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action against defendant, Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc., and dismissing the counterclaims of both defendants except to the extent indicated therein, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The evidence adduced at the trial shows that defendant, Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc., was the known agent of defendant, Weiss & Biheller Merchandise Corp., and despite any betrayal of Weiss & Biheller by its said agent, the plaintiff is entitled to the sum awarded to it, as Weiss & Biheller did receive the benefits of plaintiff’s labor and services. We have examined the contentions raised by the cross appellants and find them to be without merit. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 17, 1975, in favor of plaintiff against defendant, Weiss & Biheller Merchandise Corporation, in the sum of $24,496.92, dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action against defendant, Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc., and dismissing the counterclaims of both defendants except to the extent indicated therein, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The evidence adduced at the trial shows that defendant, Katz, Jacobs & Douglas, Inc., was the known agent of defendant, Weiss & Biheller Merchandise Corp., and despite any betrayal of Weiss & Biheller by its said agent, the plaintiff is entitled to the sum awarded to it, as Weiss & Biheller did receive the benefits of plaintiff’s labor and services. We have examined the contentions raised by the cross appellants and find them to be without merit. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 862, 374 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanover-lithographing-inc-v-katz-jacobs-douglas-inc-nyappdiv-1975.