Hanover Insurance Co. v. Victor
393 U.S. 7, 89 S. Ct. 44
Opinion
HANOVER INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK
v.
VICTOR.
Supreme Court of United States.
Florindo M. DeRosa, Duncan C. Lee, Frank A. Celentano, and Peter J. Malloy, Jr., for appellant.
Harriet E. Gair for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hanover Insurance Co. v. Victor, 393 U.S. 7, 89 S. Ct. 44 (1968).
393 U.S. 7 (Hanover Insurance Co. v. Victor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barbara G. Holzsager, of the Estate of Donald M. Holzsager, Deceased, and Barbara G. Holzsager, Individually v. The Valley Hospital
646 F.2d 792 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Holzsager v. Valley Hospital
493 F. Supp. 120 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Ranz v. Sposato
106 Misc. 2d 156 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Savchuk v. Rush
272 N.W.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Savchuk v. Randal Rush
245 N.W.2d 624 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1976)
Sykes v. Beal
392 F. Supp. 1089 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Rintala v. Shoemaker
362 F. Supp. 1044 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Varady v. Margolis
303 F. Supp. 23 (S.D. New York, 1968)