Hanover Insurance Co. v. Victor
393 U.S. 7, 89 S. Ct. 44
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1968
Docket50
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases
This text of 393 U.S. 7 (Hanover Insurance Co. v. Victor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hanover Insurance Co. v. Victor, 393 U.S. 7, 89 S. Ct. 44 (1968).
Opinion
HANOVER INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK
v.
VICTOR.
Supreme Court of United States.
Florindo M. DeRosa, Duncan C. Lee, Frank A. Celentano, and Peter J. Malloy, Jr., for appellant.
Harriet E. Gair for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barbara G. Holzsager, of the Estate of Donald M. Holzsager, Deceased, and Barbara G. Holzsager, Individually v. The Valley Hospital
646 F.2d 792 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Holzsager v. Valley Hospital
493 F. Supp. 120 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Ranz v. Sposato
106 Misc. 2d 156 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Savchuk v. Rush
272 N.W.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Savchuk v. Randal Rush
245 N.W.2d 624 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1976)
Sykes v. Beal
392 F. Supp. 1089 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Rintala v. Shoemaker
362 F. Supp. 1044 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Varady v. Margolis
303 F. Supp. 23 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 7, 89 S. Ct. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanover-insurance-co-v-victor-scotus-1968.