Hanover Fire Ins. v. Specktor

Supreme Court

Hanover Fire Ins. v. Specktor

280 U.S. 534, 50 S. Ct. 161

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 27, 1930

DocketNo. 167

StatusPublished

This text of 280 U.S. 534 (Hanover Fire Ins. v. Specktor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanover Fire Ins. v. Specktor, 280 U.S. 534, 50 S. Ct. 161 (1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Horace Michener Schell, with whom Mr. Henry A. Craig was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Wm. A. Gray for appellees.

The appeal is. dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Horace Michener Schell, with whom Mr. Henry A. Craig was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Wm. A. Gray for appellees.

The appeal is. dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 U.S. 534, 50 S. Ct. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanover-fire-ins-v-specktor-scotus-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack