Hanofee v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanofee v. Board of Elections

24 A.D.2d 729, 263 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3368

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 1965·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

In Proceeding No. 1, Special Term properly-found valid the candidacy of respondent Williams and dismissed the petition as to him; but the evidence mandated the same disposition in respect of respondent Ratner and, petitioner Sykes being a “ candidate aggrieved ” (Election Law, § 330, subd. 1), the filing of objections was not prerequisite to the commencement of the proceeding by him. Order in Proceeding No. 1 modified, on the law and the facts, in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. .In Proceeding No. 2, order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

In Proceeding No. 1, Special Term properly-found valid the candidacy of respondent Williams and dismissed the petition as to him; but the evidence mandated the same disposition in respect of respondent Ratner and, petitioner Sykes being a “ candidate aggrieved ” (Election Law, § 330, subd. 1), the filing of objections was not prerequisite to the commencement of the proceeding by him. Order in Proceeding No. 1 modified, on the law and the facts, in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. .In Proceeding No. 2, order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Hanofee v. Board of Elections, 24 A.D.2d 729, 263 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

24 A.D.2d 729 (Hanofee v. Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related