Hano Paper Corp. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hano Paper Corp. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

250 A.D. 49, 293 N.Y.S. 804

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 49 (Hano Paper Corp. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hano Paper Corp. v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 250 A.D. 49, 293 N.Y.S. 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the motion for summary judgment should have been denied as there are issues of fact that must await trial. In view of this ruling we consider also that the motion to amend the answer should have been allowed.

The orders should be reversed, without costs, the motion for summary judgment denied, and defendant’s motion for leave to serve a further amended answer without disturbing the date of joinder of issue herein granted, the amended answer to be served within ten days from date of entry of the order hereon.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon and Dore, JJ.

Orders unanimously reversed, without costs, the motion for summary judgment denied, and defendant’s motion for leave to serve a further amended answer without disturbing the date of joinder of issue herein granted, the amended answer to be served within ten days after service of order with notice of entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the motion for summary judgment should have been denied as there are issues of fact that must await trial. In view of this ruling we consider also that the motion to amend the answer should have been allowed.

The orders should be reversed, without costs, the motion for summary judgment denied, and defendant’s motion for leave to serve a further amended answer without disturbing the date of joinder of issue herein granted, the amended answer to be served within ten days from date of entry of the order hereon.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon and Dore, JJ.

Orders unanimously reversed, without costs, the motion for summary judgment denied, and defendant’s motion for leave to serve a further amended answer without disturbing the date of joinder of issue herein granted, the amended answer to be served within ten days after service of order with notice of entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 49, 293 N.Y.S. 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hano-paper-corp-v-f-w-woolworth-co-nyappdiv-1937.