Hannsz v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 398
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 1961
DocketNo. 32,716
StatusPublished

This text of 170 Tex. Crim. 398 (Hannsz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hannsz v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 398 (Tex. 1961).

Opinion

DICE, Judge.

[399]*399The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $75.

The record shows that appellant and his sureties entered into the recognizance on appeal prior to the date notice of appeal was given.

A recognizance on appeal entered into before notice of appeal is given is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court. Clepper v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. R. 89, 297 S.W. 2d 172 and Thomas v. State, 165 Tex. Cr. R. 272, 306 S. W. 2d 714.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

McDonald, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clepper v. State
297 S.W.2d 172 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Thomas v. State
165 Tex. Crim. 272 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Thomas v. State
306 S.W.2d 714 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 Tex. Crim. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannsz-v-state-texcrimapp-1961.